iajit
  • IAJIT
  • Archive
    • Volume 20, 2023
      • January 2023, No.1
      • March 2023, No.2
    • Volume 19, 2022
      • January 2022, No.1
      • March 2022, No.2
      • May 2022, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2022, No. 3A
      • July 2022, No. 4
      • September 2022, No. 5
      • November 2022, No. 6
    • Volume 18, 2021
      • January 2021, No.1
      • March 2021, No.2
      • May 2021, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2021, No. 3A
      • July 2021, No. 4
      • September 2021, No. 5
      • November 2021, No. 6
    • Volume 17, 2020
      • January 2020, No.1
      • March 2020, No. 2
      • May 2020, No. 3
      • July 2020, No. 4
      • Special Issue 2020, No. 4A
      • September 2020, No. 5
      • November 2020, No. 6
    • Volume 16, 2019
      • January 2019, No.1
      • March 2019, No. 2
      • May 2019, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2019, No. 3A
      • July 2019, No. 4
      • September 2019, No. 5
      • November 2019, No. 6
    • Volume 15, 2018
      • January 2018, No.1
      • March 2018, No. 2
      • May 2018, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2018, No. 3A
      • July 2018, No. 4
      • September 2018, No. 5
      • November 2018, No. 6
    • Volume 14, 2017
      • January 2017, No.1
      • March 2017, No. 2
      • May 2017, No. 3
      • July 2017, No. 4
      • pecial Issue 2017, No. 4A
      • September 2017, No 5
      • November 2017, No. 6
    • Volume 13, 2016
      • January 2016. No.1
      • March 2016, No. 2
      • May 2016, No. 3
      • July 2016, No.4
      • September 2016, No.5
      • November 2016, No.6
    • Volume 12, 2015
      • January 2015. No.1
      • March 2015. No.2
      • May 2015. No.3
      • July 2015. No.4
      • September 2015. No. 5
      • November 2015. No. 6
      • December 2015. No. 6A
    • Volume 11, 2014
      • January 2014, No.1
      • March 2014, No.2
      • May 2014, No.3
      • July 2014, No.4
      • November 2014, No.6
    • Volume 10, 2013
      • January 2013, No. 1
      • March 2013, No.2
      • May 2013, No. 3
      • July 2013, No. 4
      • November 2013, No. 6
    • Volume 9, 2012
      • January 2012, No. 1
      • March 2012, No. 2
      • May 2012, No. 3
      • July 2012, No. 4
      • September 2012, No. 5
      • November 2012, No. 6
    • Volume 8, 2011
      • January 2011, No 1
      • April 2011, No. 2
      • July 2011, No. 3
      • October 2011, No.4
    • Volume 7, 2010
      • October 2010, No. 4
      • July 2010, No. 3
      • April 2010, No. 2
      • January 2010, No. 1
    • Volume 6, 2009
      • January 2009, No. 1
      • April 2009, No. 2
      • July 2009, No. 3
      • October 2009, No. 4
      • November 2009, No. 5
    • Volume 5, 2008
      • January 2008, No. 1
      • April 2008, No.2
      • July 2008, No. 3
      • October 2008, No. 4
    • Volume 4, 2007
      • January 2007, No. 1
      • April 2007, No. 2
      • July 2007, No.3
      • October 2007, No. 4
    • Volume 3, 2006
      • January 2006, No. 1
      • April 2006, No. 2
      • July 2006, No. 3
      • October 2006, No. 4
    • Volume 2, 2005
      • January 2005, No. 1
      • April 2005, No. 2
      • July 2005, No. 3
      • October 2005, No. 4
    • Volume 1, 2003-2004
      • July 2004, No. 2
      • January 2004, No. 1
      • July 2003, No. 0
  • About IAJIT
  • About CCIS
  • IAJIT Impact Factor

Instructions to Reviewers

  • Home\
  • Instructions to Reviewers

Instructions to Reviewers

3923
The peer review process is the backbone of the publication process. We are appreciative to the hundreds of researchers who dedicate their time and efforts to the evaluation of articles sent for publication in IAJIT journal. The reviewer is responsible for thoroughly assessing the contents of an assigned manuscript and then provide an accurate and constructive feedback to the authors. Our articles are evaluated by at least two experts who suggest whether the manuscript should be considered for publication, requires revisions or should be outright rejected.
 

Before you Review

Once a manuscript is assigned to you for review, please consider the following points:

  1. Does the manuscript match your Areas of Expertise?
  2. Do you have enough time to spare for a detailed review of the article?
  3. Is there any conflict of interest with the authors?
  4. Are you planning to write an article on the same topic?
If you feel that you can properly carry out the evaluation of the assigned article without any problem, you can take up the review process from the Editorial System.
 

Peer Review Process

Once you have taken up the article for evaluation, please keep in mind the following points:

Confidentiality

You are acting as a representative of Science Publications and all files sent to you are extremely confidential. Being a reviewer, you cannot share any documents and/or information without proper authorization from the Editorial Team. If you would like to add any colleague in the review process, you will have to discuss with an Editorial Assistant first. Reviewers should also take extreme caution with research ideas and should not in any case use the data and/or topics in their own personal manuscripts.
 

Timely Review

A good and productive review process takes significant time. However, as authors are eagerly awaiting the evaluation results, we request our reviewers to deliver their comments within 3-5 weeks. If you feel that the article requires extensive reading, please inform the Editorial Office within the first week. 
 

Ethics

Being a reviewer, you also have to take into consideration if the article has any ethical issues. If you feel that the article in parts or in full has improperly copied any existing research, please raise this with the Editors. You should also check to see if the article is based on accuracy rather than personal statements and objectives.
 

Structure

The structure and content is the essential part of a manuscript. Reviewers should put their main focus on this portion and a majority of the review report should concentrate on the quality of the research.

Reviewers should carefully evaluate the following aspects of a manuscript:
  

Originality and Scope

Is the research topic a current and innovative idea? Is there any discussion on this matter and is it related to the scope of the journal? Has there been any previous research in this area? If so, is there any need for further research? Would the journal or any reader benefit from this article? Is there significant interest in this area of research? 
 

Title

Does the title properly explain the purpose and objective of the article? Is it too lengthy (Readers usually prefer clear and concise titles)?

Abstract

Does the abstract contain an appropriate summary for the article? Is the language used in the abstract easy to read and understand? Are there any suggestions for improvement?
 

Introduction

Do the authors provide adequate background on the topic and reason for this article? Does this section describe what the authors hoped to achieve? The introduction should provide a detailed outline for the article including the proposed experiment, the research method and results.

Materials and Methods

Is there detailed information on the experiment and research? Do the authors approach the subject with the proper method? Do they provide sufficient reasoning for their approach? Are the sample data and design clearly outlined? Can readers use the information given to replicate the research? Are all the measurements, equipment and materials adequately described?
 

Results

  • Are the results presented in a clear manner?
  • Do the authors provide accurate research results?
  • Is there sufficient evidence for each result?

Conclusion

Is there any flaws in the research results and methodology? Does the research provide ample data for the authors to make their conclusion? Have the authors highlighted their future implications and usage of their research? Is there any scope for further improvement? Did the authors outline the objective of their conclusions? 
  • Prev
  • Next

IAJIT

  • Aims and Scops
  • Editorial Board
  • Technical Committee
  • Instruction to Authors
  • Submit your Paper
  • Track your Paper
  • Instructions for the Camera-Ready Version
  • Instructions to Reviewers
  • Review Paper
  • Subscription Information
  • Open access policy
  • Contact Us
  • FAQS
  • IAJIT
  • Archive
    • Volume 20, 2023
      • January 2023, No.1
      • March 2023, No.2
    • Volume 19, 2022
      • January 2022, No.1
      • March 2022, No.2
      • May 2022, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2022, No. 3A
      • July 2022, No. 4
      • September 2022, No. 5
      • November 2022, No. 6
    • Volume 18, 2021
      • January 2021, No.1
      • March 2021, No.2
      • May 2021, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2021, No. 3A
      • July 2021, No. 4
      • September 2021, No. 5
      • November 2021, No. 6
    • Volume 17, 2020
      • January 2020, No.1
      • March 2020, No. 2
      • May 2020, No. 3
      • July 2020, No. 4
      • Special Issue 2020, No. 4A
      • September 2020, No. 5
      • November 2020, No. 6
    • Volume 16, 2019
      • January 2019, No.1
      • March 2019, No. 2
      • May 2019, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2019, No. 3A
      • July 2019, No. 4
      • September 2019, No. 5
      • November 2019, No. 6
    • Volume 15, 2018
      • January 2018, No.1
      • March 2018, No. 2
      • May 2018, No. 3
      • Special Issue 2018, No. 3A
      • July 2018, No. 4
      • September 2018, No. 5
      • November 2018, No. 6
    • Volume 14, 2017
      • January 2017, No.1
      • March 2017, No. 2
      • May 2017, No. 3
      • July 2017, No. 4
      • pecial Issue 2017, No. 4A
      • September 2017, No 5
      • November 2017, No. 6
    • Volume 13, 2016
      • January 2016. No.1
      • March 2016, No. 2
      • May 2016, No. 3
      • July 2016, No.4
      • September 2016, No.5
      • November 2016, No.6
    • Volume 12, 2015
      • January 2015. No.1
      • March 2015. No.2
      • May 2015. No.3
      • July 2015. No.4
      • September 2015. No. 5
      • November 2015. No. 6
      • December 2015. No. 6A
    • Volume 11, 2014
      • January 2014, No.1
      • March 2014, No.2
      • May 2014, No.3
      • July 2014, No.4
      • November 2014, No.6
    • Volume 10, 2013
      • January 2013, No. 1
      • March 2013, No.2
      • May 2013, No. 3
      • July 2013, No. 4
      • November 2013, No. 6
    • Volume 9, 2012
      • January 2012, No. 1
      • March 2012, No. 2
      • May 2012, No. 3
      • July 2012, No. 4
      • September 2012, No. 5
      • November 2012, No. 6
    • Volume 8, 2011
      • January 2011, No 1
      • April 2011, No. 2
      • July 2011, No. 3
      • October 2011, No.4
    • Volume 7, 2010
      • October 2010, No. 4
      • July 2010, No. 3
      • April 2010, No. 2
      • January 2010, No. 1
    • Volume 6, 2009
      • January 2009, No. 1
      • April 2009, No. 2
      • July 2009, No. 3
      • October 2009, No. 4
      • November 2009, No. 5
    • Volume 5, 2008
      • January 2008, No. 1
      • April 2008, No.2
      • July 2008, No. 3
      • October 2008, No. 4
    • Volume 4, 2007
      • January 2007, No. 1
      • April 2007, No. 2
      • July 2007, No.3
      • October 2007, No. 4
    • Volume 3, 2006
      • January 2006, No. 1
      • April 2006, No. 2
      • July 2006, No. 3
      • October 2006, No. 4
    • Volume 2, 2005
      • January 2005, No. 1
      • April 2005, No. 2
      • July 2005, No. 3
      • October 2005, No. 4
    • Volume 1, 2003-2004
      • July 2004, No. 2
      • January 2004, No. 1
      • July 2003, No. 0
  • About IAJIT
  • About CCIS
  • IAJIT Impact Factor
Top
We use cookies to improve our website. By continuing to use this website, you are giving consent to cookies being used. More details…